[GPOC] [Pvgreens-discussion] pro~choice has no choice

[Margaret]

Well, Sandy, IF we had a candidate, I WOULD vote for them.
But we do not.
We need to produce VIABLE candidates and vote for them. Until we can, and 
do, all we have are 'the lesser of evils'. And to me, Ritter is far less 
evil than bo Pray. And until we do, and can, we have a choice between one 
person who will do alot less damage than the other.  We can stand around 
whining and wringing our hands and not vote for anyone, because WE didn't 
produce a worthy candidate.
   JMHO
Margaret

> This is what I mean by obediently voting for the right wing candidates
> presented to us by the Right. They give you a choice of 2 right wing
> candidates and you obediently vote for one of them. My advice is to tell
> them both to get lost (unless, of course, you agree with one of them). As
> long as the majority does what you suggest, there will never, ever be a
> left wing alternative.
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:25 -0500 "Margaret" <omacu at frii.com> writes:
>
> "Micheal Moore once said something like 'if your house is on fire, it is
> no time to be arguing about what color to paint the bathroom."
>
> Our house has been on fire at least since the end of WWII, when Truman
> (who would probably have been YOUR choice) nuked innocent civilians in
> Japan. By continuing to vote for right wing candidates, people like you
> have ensured that our house would burn down, which is what it is doing
> now. This country is in a meltdown, and you are pushing for it to melt
> all the way down, instead of putting a stop to it.
>
> My question for both Larry and Margaret is: what are you even a Green, if
> all you want to do is to continue to elect Right wing Democrats?
>
> Sandy