[GPOC] [Pvgreens-discussion] pro~choice has no choice

sandylemberg at juno.com sandylemberg at juno.com
Fri Jun 23 15:40:11 MDT 2006


On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:35:48 -0600 LBolt <rcripes at netzero.net> writes:

"In my opinion, NOT voting for Ritter is akin to handing a vote to Babo 
Pray (he'll clean things up right religiously) on a silver platter."

This is what I mean by obediently voting for the right wing candidates
presented to us by the Right. They give you a choice of 2 right wing
candidates and you obediently vote for one of them. My advice is to tell
them both to get lost (unless, of course, you agree with one of them). As
long as the majority does what you suggest, there will never, ever be a
left wing alternative.

On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:19:25 -0500 "Margaret" <omacu at frii.com> writes:

"Micheal Moore once said something like 'if your house is on fire, it is
no time to be arguing about what color to paint the bathroom."

Our house has been on fire at least since the end of WWII, when Truman
(who would probably have been YOUR choice) nuked innocent civilians in
Japan. By continuing to vote for right wing candidates, people like you
have ensured that our house would burn down, which is what it is doing
now. This country is in a meltdown, and you are pushing for it to melt
all the way down, instead of putting a stop to it.

My question for both Larry and Margaret is: what are you even a Green, if
all you want to do is to continue to elect Right wing Democrats?

Sandy


More information about the Pvgreens-discussion mailing list